- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:27:45 +0100
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
On 30/06/2016 19:07, David MacDonald wrote: > **Loretta's response:** [...] > We had a lot if relevant discussion when trying to define web page (or > all the alternate terms we were considering). Part of the discussion was > about web apps, which dynamically change what is delivered from the same > URI. As I recall, we concluded that any version of the page that could > be delivered from that URI had to conform in order to claim that the URI > conformed. Using URI is not a good indicator, I'd say. For instance, a site may have customisation controls (e.g. switch to high-contrast mode) which reloads the exact same URI but with customisations enabled. Saying that the non-customised and customised version, delivered under the same URI, need be conformant makes little sense (and would invalidate many "a mechanism is available..." type wordings in WCAG. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:28:11 UTC