RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop

From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 1:28 PM

That captures it, more eloquently than I, except I think you might mean on item 3 "There is an Accessibility Supported way ..." rather than "there is no Accessibility way..."
[Jason] Actually, no, the third clause is meant to address the case in which there is no (or inadequate) assistive technology support or some other lack of technology support for a particular user agent or device which makes it impossible to supply a conforming version customized for that user agent/device. Think of a platform/device type which is new enough to have no (or very little) assistive technology. Without the third clause, a customized version/UI component couldn’t be written for that platform/device, even if it’s impossible to make it conform.

Does this expalantion help?

Regards,

Jason.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________