RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1)

Good points Jon!

 

​​​​​

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell: 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog

 

From: Jonathan Avila [mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 8:51 AM
To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
Subject: RE: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1)

 

*  Ok — so you are thinking of an SC that requires pages to be viewable without requiring the user to rotate their screens in on format or another? 

 

Yes, but I think we need to carefully allow for some exceptions.   For example, I believe there could be some needs such as taking pictures of checks for mobile deposit that may work better in landscape mode give the distance of the camera from the check, etc.   Some games that scroll horizontally in landscape mode would then require two sets of scrollbars in portrait mode which might make the game unplayable, etc.

 

Jonathan

 

Jonathan Avila

Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART Group 
 <mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com

703.637.8957 (Office) 
Visit us online:  <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/> Website |  <https://twitter.com/SSBBARTGroup> Twitter |  <https://www.facebook.com/ssbbartgroup> Facebook |  <https://www.linkedin.com/company/355266?trk=tyah> Linkedin |  <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/blog/> Blog

 <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/webinars/> Check out our Digital Accessibility Webinars!

 

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:28 PM
To: Patrick H. Lauke
Cc: GLWAI Guidelines WG org; public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org <mailto:public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org> 
Subject: Re: Principle 4 - Robust (was Re: Help needed with numbering success criteria for WCAG 2.1)

 

Ah very good

 

that would definitely be a barrier to someone whose computer is locked / mounted in one position or another 

 

Ok — so you are thinking of an SC that requires pages to be viewable without requiring the user to rotate their screens in on format or another? 

Sounds like a good - and new - and testable one. 

 

anyone see a hole in this?  


gregg 

 

On Jun 28, 2016, at 4:33 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk> > wrote:

 


Many sites currently do this sort of thing in a very primitive way (they check the browser window/viewport width/height and, if it's not in the "correct" ratio, they simply put a big roadblock in front of the content until the user changes the ratio/turns the device. As noted earlier in this thread, there are now more robust standards/techniques coming (screen orientation API, CSS directives that lock a view into a particular orientation, directives in progressive web app JSON manifests that explicitly set a locked orientation). And again, WCAG currently doesn't have the tools to flag this as a problem.

P