- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:18:06 -0400
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
- CC: "Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L." <rbradley@mitre.org>, ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP55F08452784466D612E8CCFE2F0@phx.gbl>
I've moved the section of whether or not initiated by the user to the definition of Change of Content, to tighten up the wording of the SC a bit... Change of content: Changes made to a web page after it has been delivered to the user agent, whether or not initiated by the user. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:52 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > I love your edit... and have made the change on the page. > > The other issue to solve is exception #3 which tries to address a concern > introduced by another member who said "live updates on an NBA home page > would drive end users crazy." > > I thought about introducing the idea of # of updates a minute. So the 3rd > exception currently reads. > > ... unless the primary purpose of the web page is to provide real time > updates where there are more than [x] update(s) a minute. > > My thinking is that we could ask the blind community how many updates is > too much.... What are your thoughts on that and how do you think we could > address the risk of aria-live overload? > > Here's the url to the proposals > > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposed_SC_on_information_added_or_removed_from_a_page#Proposed > > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:28 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david@can-adapt.com] >> *Sent:* Saturday, June 25, 2016 11:24 AM >> >> HI Jason >> >> >> >> When you say extend 4.1.2, you mean that it apply to more than things set >> by the user, but also changes set by the page >> >> *[Jason] In essence, yes.* >> >> >> >> I think there is another limiting factor about 4.1.2 and that is that it >> applies to just "components". I Currently it requires "components" to >> provide notification of updates, so I would fail a shopping cart that did >> not have a live region to say it was updated. However, I think our >> intention when writing 4.1.2 was to ensure custom widgets made out of spans >> and divs still had an accessible name etc... >> >> >> >> For that reason I'm shy about trying to extend it to the entire page AND >> to non-user actions. I think we might be better introducing a new SC. The >> proposed language of the new SC covers user actions AND page actions and it >> is specifically about notification rather than what we find in 4.1.2 which >> is primarily about NAME, ROLE, VALUE. >> >> >> >> I've introduce the phrase ", whether initiated by the user or by the >> page" Does that in combination with the loading/busy SC cover it. >> >> >> >> *SC x.x.x.x Change of content:* Programmatic notification is provided >> for each change in content that indicates an action was taken or that >> conveys information, whether initiated by the user or by the page, unless >> one or more of the following is true: ... >> >> >> *[Jason] I like it. I’m not sure that “by the page” conveys the right >> idea. Suppose we say “whether or not initiated by the user” just to cover >> all cases unambiguously.* >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or >> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom >> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail >> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or >> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete >> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. >> >> Thank you for your compliance. >> ------------------------------ >> > >
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2016 16:18:39 UTC