Re: Add a 'Date reviewed' field to techniques and failures

> It could generate the impression that the working group doesn’t adequately review techniques documents before publishing them as W3C notes. 

It shouldn’t, if it is framed as a review date. Review & publish are different, I would expect things to be reviewed more often than they are published.

If something was published 6 years ago and hasn’t been reviewed in that time, is it still valid?

Having a last-reviewed date enables us to mark it as fresh, even if it hasn’t changed.

-Alastair

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 13:11:03 UTC