- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:10:32 +0000
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> It could generate the impression that the working group doesn’t adequately review techniques documents before publishing them as W3C notes. It shouldn’t, if it is framed as a review date. Review & publish are different, I would expect things to be reviewed more often than they are published. If something was published 6 years ago and hasn’t been reviewed in that time, is it still valid? Having a last-reviewed date enables us to mark it as fresh, even if it hasn’t changed. -Alastair
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 13:11:03 UTC