- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:05:54 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>On 10/05/2016 12:49, josh@interaccess.ie wrote: >>Interesting, I'd say that's a maybe. As looking at 1.4.3, I see F83 >>does >>call out that the the background image should provide >>sufficient colour contrast, a better fit. It still doesn't explicitly >>address the issue of legibility, that may not be due to contrast >>issues. >>One of the LVTF, if they haven't started looking at this already. > >If text contrasts sufficiently with (theoretically) all the different >colors of the image, then shouldn't it be legible, regardless of how >busy the image itself is? Honest question, not really tested this/have >any examples. Think of an image of a grid with small cells used as a background (contrived I know..), or a photo of a building/bridge, skyscrapers at night etc where the colours themselves may conform, but together result in a visually busy/distracting image. So I'd say no. My 2 cents > >P >-- Patrick H. Lauke > >www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com >twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 12:06:36 UTC