- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 09:33:28 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 03/05/2016 09:27, Alastair Campbell wrote: > It could also provide more context about the technology, e.g. ‘if ARIA is part of your Accessibility Supported list, then if is a failure not to use landmarks for 1.3.1’. But surely it still isn't, regardless what the author/site owner considers their "accessibility supported" baseline of technologies, if they do still provide some other technique that doesn't use ARIA to satisfy that part of 1.3.1. It's not like they entered a binding contract that now forces them to only ever use ARIA techniques... P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 08:33:37 UTC