- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:55:58 -0400
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
- CC: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP255DFF50732655177EDA527FE640@phx.gbl>
This is an excellent point "technology relied upon" ... but unfortunately, a failure based on that for HTML5 or WAI-ARIA cannot get through a vote. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:48 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] > > > > > >But what about failures which are now only failures because there is new > >technology available now? Which weren't failures previously because the > >technology wasn't even available? > > This depends on whether the author is "relying upon" the newer technology > in order to conform to the Guidelines. > > If the author isn't relying upon the newer technology, i.e., the content > conforms without it, then the new "failures" documented in non-normative > material won't be applicable, since they're not relevant to conformance. > > If the newer technology is relied upon, then the author can use it > inappropriately - and this may make a difference to conformance, hence the > new "feailure" cases become relevant. > > Thus I think it all depends on the list of technologies relied upon, not > on dates or other factors. > > > ________________________________ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > > > Thank you for your compliance. > > ________________________________ >
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 15:56:31 UTC