Re: CfC: Issue 171

+1

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

On 5 April 2016 at 18:15, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:

> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 7 at 1:30pm Boston time.
>
> GitHub issue 171 related to the need for web pages to use Landmarks to
> conform to SC 1.3.1 has a proposed response as a result of a survey and
> discussion on the working group call (
> https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05).
>
> Proposed response:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171#issuecomment-205901598
>
> “The Working Group agrees that Landmarks are not required to meet SC 1.3.1
> for any page with head/foot/navigation areas as there are other ways to
> indicate a page's structure."
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>