RE: CfC: Issue 171

+1 to the CFC.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk]
> Sent: 05 April 2016 19:22
> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: CfC: Issue 171
> 
> +1
> 
> On 05/04/2016 18:15, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
> > CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 7 at 1:30pm Boston time.
> >
> > GitHub issue 171 related to the need for web pages to use Landmarks to
> > conform to SC 1.3.1 has a proposed response as a result of a survey
> > and discussion on the working group call
> > (https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05).
> >
> > Proposed response:
> > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171#issuecomment-205901598
> >
> > “The Working Group agrees that Landmarks are not required to meet SC
> > 1.3.1 for any page with head/foot/navigation areas as there are other
> > ways to indicate a page's structure."
> >
> > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
> > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you
> > “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know
> > before the CfC deadline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > AWK
> >
> > Andrew Kirkpatrick
> > Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> > Adobe
> >
> > akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> > http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
> 
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> 
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:42:03 UTC