- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:40:46 +0100
- To: "'Patrick H. Lauke'" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1 to the CFC. > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] > Sent: 05 April 2016 19:22 > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Re: CfC: Issue 171 > > +1 > > On 05/04/2016 18:15, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote: > > CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 7 at 1:30pm Boston time. > > > > GitHub issue 171 related to the need for web pages to use Landmarks to > > conform to SC 1.3.1 has a proposed response as a result of a survey > > and discussion on the working group call > > (https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05). > > > > Proposed response: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171#issuecomment-205901598 > > > > “The Working Group agrees that Landmarks are not required to meet SC > > 1.3.1 for any page with head/foot/navigation areas as there are other > > ways to indicate a page's structure." > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have > > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you > > “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know > > before the CfC deadline. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> > > http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility > > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:42:03 UTC