- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:22:23 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
+1 On 05/04/2016 18:15, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote: > CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday April 7 at 1:30pm Boston time. > > GitHub issue 171 related to the need for web pages to use Landmarks to > conform to SC 1.3.1 has a proposed response as a result of a survey and > discussion on the working group call > (https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05). > > Proposed response: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/171#issuecomment-205901598 > > “The Working Group agrees that Landmarks are not required to meet SC > 1.3.1 for any page with head/foot/navigation areas as there are other > ways to indicate a page's structure." > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you > “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know > before the CfC deadline. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> > http://twitter.com/awkawk > http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 18:22:50 UTC