- From: Adam Solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:28:02 +0300
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALKv3=jhZztPB2izCzvbYPW5=JoBnxuvUTDcJt=c=VGtrgxfqA@mail.gmail.com>
Lets be specific: what relationships are conveyed here through presentation? In most of the landmarks (i.e. banner main search) there often is no clear visual presentation of specific relationships. A banner might or might not have a separate background color, and even so not sure that conveys a relationship. It is simply content usually located at the top of the page. A search box is just another form which anyway should have a label. aria11 can be construed to apply to a page which uses clear and present visual cues to denote these areas, which is usually not the case. So we can leave this technique where it is to encourage its use without saying it is mandatory (had a thought of suggesting it be advisory - please don't throw any tomatoes at me). +1 to gregg jon and their team On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > I’ll just +1 John & Gregg’s responses, we can’t make a fail of something > that didn’t exist when WCAG 2.0 came out, although it might be the best > practice in many cases. > > I think it’s also a useful example when considering how WCAG.next might > work, as it is something that could be strengthened in the guidelines in > response to updated technology. > > -Alastair >
Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 10:28:29 UTC