- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:13:38 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8EF2C668-42D3-4722-97FD-6D82A573AD90@adobe.com>
WCAGers, As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no negative responses during it, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group. This decision is recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 09:58 To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Subject: CfC on Issue 102 Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 09:59 CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Tuesday December 9 at 10am Boston time. Issue 102 has been discussed and we believe that there is a consensus that while the described issue is a problem for users it is not specific to users with disabilities and as a result WCAG 2.0 does not cover it. The proposed response is here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/102#issuecomment-161801841 If you have new concerns that haven’t been already addressed that should make the WG reconsider this decision, please respond to this call before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2015 20:14:10 UTC