Re: Diagram of WCAG Extension integration into WCAG (Proposal)

Hi David,
The revision much clearer, thanks!
One could add, above the Extension bubble, something like "Regulators may opt to require:" but perhaps that is too much crammed into this diagram.

Best,
Detlev


On 24 Sep 2015, at 22:47, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> I've taken the feedback and created another diagram that may be clearer. I've tried to simplify it, particularly reducing the complexity of the errors.
> 
> http://davidmacd.com/blog/WCAG-extension-proposed-integration-into-WCAG.html
> 
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>  
> CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
> Tel:  613.235.4902
> LinkedIn
> www.Can-Adapt.com
>   
>   Adapting the web to all users
>             Including those with disabilities
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> 
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:38 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Detlev
> 
> >>"WCAG Extension" is both the label of the blob in the normative section BUT ALSO heads the WCAG extensions to the left (the boxes Mobile, Coginitve, Low vision).
> 
> The proposal is that the left side is the the individual task force work. Any success criteria and guidelines would be gathered up and adjusted for redundancies etc, 
> 
> >>The meaning of the arrows could be that some or all of that stuff feeds into a normative extension or that there a relation of sorts between two separate things.
> 
> Yes, I'm suggesting that the three extensions could be combined into one normative extension. 
> 
> >>>it doesn't tell me clearly if and when I need to meet the Extension to claim WCAG 2.0 conformance.
> 
> WCAG 2 will never change, so the extension circle is not required to meet WCAG 2 but if some jurisdiction requires "WCAG2 + Extension", then it would be required in addition to WCAG. That is why it is in the normative box... Normative means it will go through a formal acceptance procedure which is very rigorous. Once something is declared normative it is very hard to change... that would be any Guidelines and Success Criteria that the task forces make, and are approved.
> 
> Explanation of Normative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normative  
> 
> The techniques we work up in the task forces will go into the "informative" bucket... they are non normative and can be easily changed, fixed, or adapted and they can be referenced either by the extension or the core WCAG.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>  
> CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
> Tel:  613.235.4902
> LinkedIn
> www.Can-Adapt.com
>   
>   Adapting the web to all users
>             Including those with disabilities
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> 
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:
> What I currently find confusing is that "WCAG Extension" is both the label of the blob in the normative section BUT ALSO heads the WCAG extensions to the left (the boxes Mobile, Coginitve, Low vision). The meaning of the arrows could be that some or all of that stuff feeds into a normative extension or that there a relation of sorts between two separate things.  The diagram also leaves me uncertain as to the exact status of *the* Extension or the *extensions* - it doesn't tell me clearly if and when I need to meet the Extension to claim WCAG 2.0 conformance.
> 
> --
> Detlev Fischer
> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
> 
> Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
> Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
> 
> http://www.testkreis.de
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
> 
> Laura Carlson schrieb am 24.09.2015 16:33:
> 
> > Hi David and all,
> >
> > I think the idea of a  flowchart to depicted how separate extensions
> > become 1 unified WCAG extension is great. Reminds me of those "How a
> > bill becomes a law" diagrams.
> >
> > I gave the flowchart it's own section on the WCAG 2 Extension
> > Principles Wiki Page.
> > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2_Extension_Principles
> >
> > Thanks for your hard work.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Laura
> >
> > On 9/24/15, Srinivasu Chakravarthula <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>
> > wrote:
> >> +1 Great work, David.
> >>
> >> >From the beginning at least my understanding is that TFs are subgroups of
> >> WGs.
> >> Best,
> >> Srini
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> *Srinivasu Chakravarthula*
> >> Sr. Accessibility Consultant, *Deque* <http://deque.com>
> >> Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855
> >>
> >> Deque University <http://dequeuniversity.com> | Follow me on Twitter
> >> <http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on LinkedIn
> >> <http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About Me <http://about.me/srinivasuc>
> >>
> >> Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital experience
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Great stuff David! As discussed on the call yesterday - one area that
> >>> your diagram would need to address is the nexus/delta between related
> >>> techniques (as outputs from various TFs that cover users in other
> >>> groups).
> >>>
> >>> At least to indicate that in your document flow would be good as the
> >>> techniques may not always be exclusively related to the needs of each TFs
> >>> target user group.
> >>>
> >>> I also think that the Mobile TF, Cognitive TF  and Low Vision TF work
> >>> belongs 'inside' the 'WCAG Extension' Circle, as the TFs are tasked to do
> >>> this work, and your visual representation indicates that they may be
> >>> separate.
> >>>
> >>> Good work though :-)
> >>>
> >>> Josh
> >>>
> >>> ------ Original Message ------
> >>> From: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca>
> >>> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> >>> Sent: 23/09/2015 21:14:56
> >>> Subject: Diagram of WCAG Extension integration into WCAG (Proposal)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I've created a diagram of how we might integrate the extensions into a
> >>> single document.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://davidmacd.com/blog/WCAG-extension-proposed-integration-into-WCAG.html
> >>>
> >>> Description:
> >>> The task forces, Mobile, Cognitive, and Low Vision would develop
> >>> guidelines, success criteria and techniques separately, and then
> >>> integrate
> >>> them to resolve conflicts and overlaps and then integrate them into the
> >>> singular WCAG extension. The techniques would be collected in a non
> >>> normative document as techniques for the extension, and some of them can
> >>> be
> >>> referenced from WCAG 2 where the techniques might apply to an existing
> >>> Success criteria.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> David MacDonald
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> >>>
> >>> Tel:  613.235.4902
> >>>
> >>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
> >>>
> >>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> >>> *            Including those with disabilities*
> >>>
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> >>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Laura L. Carlson
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Detlev Fischer
testkreis - das Accessibility-Team von feld.wald.wiese
c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestraße 2
22767 Hamburg

Tel   +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3
Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84
Fax   +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 06:58:55 UTC