- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:52:46 -0500
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Steve, Sailesh may have picked up on the second message in this thread. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2015JulSep/0092.html I don't "think" extensibility does apply to the WCAG2 extension proposal at least from what I have gathered. But that should be verified with the Chairs. Kindest Regards, Laura On 7/28/15, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > hi laura > > In short, I am not really clear of "extensibility" as it applies to WCAG2 >> > > my note was in reponse to Sailesh's use of the term earlier in this thread > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > Current Standards Work @W3C > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> > > On 28 July 2015 at 13:30, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> On 7/28/15, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Also please note there is a difference between HTML extensibility ( >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html#extensibility-0) and >> > HTML >> > extensions.(http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ExtensionSpecifications) the >> > latter being a WG process. >> >> Thank you very much! The difference should be clarified for WCAG too. >> >> Neither the April 7 or July 21 minutes or any of the Wiki documents >> refer to "extensibility". They all use the word "extension". >> >> Of note: HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) was turned into >> its own spec: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/ >> >> Kindest Regards, >> Laura >> >> -- >> Laura L. Carlson >> > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 12:53:16 UTC