hi laura In short, I am not really clear of "extensibility" as it applies to WCAG2 > my note was in reponse to Sailesh's use of the term earlier in this thread -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 28 July 2015 at 13:30, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On 7/28/15, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also please note there is a difference between HTML extensibility ( > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html#extensibility-0) and HTML > > extensions.(http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ExtensionSpecifications) the > > latter being a WG process. > > Thank you very much! The difference should be clarified for WCAG too. > > Neither the April 7 or July 21 minutes or any of the Wiki documents > refer to "extensibility". They all use the word "extension". > > Of note: HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) was turned into > its own spec: > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/ > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > -- > Laura L. Carlson >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 12:36:53 UTC