- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:47:53 +0100
- To: Adam Solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
Adam Solomon wrote: > Points raised in our discussion at the wcag group meeting on 300914, to be > considered for the next group meeting: Great, thanks for that Adam. Josh > -title attribute (and aria-label) could be used to succeed use cases where > visible labels exists (i.e. set of phone number fields - see F82, or for > that matter any time there is a visible label w/o programmatic > determination, title could be used as a replacement and that might be > considered programmatic determination because it provides the same info as > the label). So, there is good reason to leave "title" and "aria-label" in > this failure. > > -there is no failure for 4.1.2 in a case where there is no visible label > and no programmatic label, i.e. in a case where there is a control with no > label whatsoever (as can happen with a select where the items in the select > list give the user an idea what to choose from). If the group feels that > this is in fact a failure, then would it be possible to include such a > failure of 4.1.2 in F68 (in which case we would need to split the test > procedure between visible labels and cases where there is no label at all, > and instances where only 4.1.2 is violated to instances where 1.3.1 is also > violated). Or, is this use case not a failure at all, since all users are > at the same disadvantage when no visible label is provided. >
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 12:48:31 UTC