AW: Agenda for 18th February 2014 WCAG call

Regrets for this telco and the telco next week. Again a conflicting call this week and I'm travelling the next week. (I've filled out the survey)

Best

Kerstin


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Joshue O Connor [mailto:joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Februar 2014 13:06
> An: WCAG
> Betreff: Agenda for 18th February 2014 WCAG call
> 
> The WCAG WG will be meeting on Tuesday, 18th February 2014 at 11AM
> Eastern US (Length: up to 90 minutes).
> 
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 (US) Passcode: 9224#
> 
> Alternatively, you can SIP directly into our teleconference.
> 
> 009224@voip.w3.org<mailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w
> 3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org<mailto:
> 009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip
> .w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org<mailt
> o:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@vo
> ip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3c
> mailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224
> @voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.or
> g>>>
> 
> IRC: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org> port: 6665 channel #wai-wcag
> 
> Agenda
> 
> 1) Comment processing for Publication
> 
> We have currently one comment relating to changes in the new draft.
> 
> LC-2883: HTML technique is a duplicate of h93 [1]
> 
> If and when more come in (note, today is also the deadline) then Captain
> Kirkpatrick will forward them to the list, or we will discuss on Tues call. These
> comments will have top priority.
> 
> Note, there are other comments that will need to be addressed, so I'm
> including the full list I've added to the tracker here. Note, these comments
> do NOT relate to changes in the current draft, so are not a priority but will
> shortly need owners to draft responses.
> 
> LC-2877: The technique should mention input type = file
> LC-2878: The test doesn't require association between header and data cells
> LC-2879: Move the logic away from How to meet and into the technique
> LC-2880: This technique should be a failure technique
> LC-2881: This technique should be advisory G183
> LC-2882: Add a warning about the poor support for this technique h69
> LC-2883: HTML technique is a duplicate of h93
> LC-2884: This technique should be generalized h90
> LC-2885: This technique should be generalized h92
> LC-2886: This technique should be generalized C29
> LC-2887: This technique should be generalized h87
> LC-2888: This technique should be generalized C26
> LC-2889: The technique should be more specific h86
> LC-2890: This technique entirely covered by H53
> LC-2891: The technique doesn’t solve the problem of the success criterion
> SCR21
> LC-2892: F76: Failure of Success Criterion 3.2.2
> LC-2893: Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.3
> LC-2894: Inaccessible supporting PDF examples
> 
> [1]
> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-WCAG20-
> TECHS-20140107/
> 
> 2) Technique training & development
> 
> We will discuss what training and guidance is needed for WG members who
> will soon be working on techniques, as well as answer any questions you may
> have.
> 
> 3) Technique Assignments
> 
> We will discuss the division of labour.
> 
> --
> Joshue O Connor/Andrew Kirkpatrick
> WCAG working group co-chairs
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:40:15 UTC