Re: Agenda for 18th February 2014 WCAG call

possible regrets...

Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

www.Can-Adapt.com



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy
policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>wrote:

> The WCAG WG will be meeting on Tuesday, 18th February 2014 at 11AM Eastern
> US (Length: up to 90 minutes).
>
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 (US) Passcode: 9224#
>
> Alternatively, you can SIP directly into our teleconference.
>
> 009224@voip.w3.org<mailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%
> 3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org<mailto:0092
> 24@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%
> 3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org<mailto:0092
> 24@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%
> 3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:
> 009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org
> %3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org%3cmailto:009224@voip.w3.org>>>
>
> IRC: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org> port: 6665 channel #wai-wcag
>
> Agenda
>
> 1) Comment processing for Publication
>
> We have currently one comment relating to changes in the new draft.
>
> LC-2883: HTML technique is a duplicate of h93 [1]
>
> If and when more come in (note, today is also the deadline) then Captain
> Kirkpatrick will forward them to the list, or we will discuss on Tues call.
> These comments will have top priority.
>
> Note, there are other comments that will need to be addressed, so I'm
> including the full list I've added to the tracker here. Note, these
> comments do NOT relate to changes in the current draft, so are not a
> priority but will shortly need owners to draft responses.
>
> LC-2877: The technique should mention input type = file
> LC-2878: The test doesn't require association between header and data cells
> LC-2879: Move the logic away from How to meet and into the technique
> LC-2880: This technique should be a failure technique
> LC-2881: This technique should be advisory G183
> LC-2882: Add a warning about the poor support for this technique h69
> LC-2883: HTML technique is a duplicate of h93
> LC-2884: This technique should be generalized h90
> LC-2885: This technique should be generalized h92
> LC-2886: This technique should be generalized C29
> LC-2887: This technique should be generalized h87
> LC-2888: This technique should be generalized C26
> LC-2889: The technique should be more specific h86
> LC-2890: This technique entirely covered by H53
> LC-2891: The technique doesnâ EURO (tm)t solve the problem of the success
> criterion SCR21
> LC-2892: F76: Failure of Success Criterion 3.2.2
> LC-2893: Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.3
> LC-2894: Inaccessible supporting PDF examples
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-
> WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/
>
> 2) Technique training & development
>
> We will discuss what training and guidance is needed for WG members who
> will soon be working on techniques, as well as answer any questions you may
> have.
>
> 3) Technique Assignments
>
> We will discuss the division of labour.
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor/Andrew Kirkpatrick
> WCAG working group co-chairs
>
>
>
>
>