- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:04:54 +0100
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>, WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, Eric Velleman <e.velleman@accessibility.nl>
Dear Eval TF, WCAG WG, ERT WG, (and EOWG), Thank you for those who provided comments [1] on the 29 November 2013 Editor Draft of W3C/WAI Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) [2]. The following Disposition of Comments lists how the editors propose to resolve your comments, for your review: - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20131129 [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20131129/ [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20131129 Two open comments remain relating to the term "core functionality" and to the section "provide a performance score (optional)" that we'll be discussing with you at upcoming WG meetings. Let us know if there are other comments that need further discussion before publication as draft. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 14:05:28 UTC