RE: 14 Feb 2013 Agenda ================================================

Partial regrets.  I anticipate having to drop off the call at some point for 20 minutes or so.


From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:GV@trace.wisc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:02 PM
To: WCAG
Subject: 14 Feb 2013 Agenda ================================================

APOLOGIES

    Loretta is out of town -- and I forgot to post the agenda for this week.

The agenda is basically the two surveys that were sent out early this week.    However only a few people have responded to the surveys.

Please go up and fill out the surveys.  Both are important.    Both are described at the bottom of this Agenda.

Thanks
Gregg



Meeting Information
Time: 21:00 UTC, 8 AM Eastern Australia, 10 PM Central Europe, 4 PM Eastern US
World Clock: <http://tinyurl.com/a96u3xh>
Length: up to 90 minutes
Bridge: +1.617.761.6200<tel:%2B1.617.761.6200> (US), +33.4.26.46.79.03<tel:%2B33.4.26.46.79.03> (France), +44.203.318.0479<tel:%2B44.203.318.0479>(UK)
Passcode: 9224#
IRC: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org> port: 6665 channel #wai-wcag


1. FINAL 4 SC for WCAG2ICT
    Survey    https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/FINAL4SC/

2. Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0
    A survey covering the comment responses -- and the draft is prepared and available at
      https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAGevalTaskForce/

3. (if we have time ) Responses to Public Comments on WCAG2ICT, starting
    with LC-2659
    Survey: http://tinyurl.com/balvfg3





SURVEY 1  INFORMATION

The WCAG WG has approved all but 4 SC in WCAG2ICT.

  *   Three of these were approved for documents only and 1 was approved but later found to have a problem and sent back.
  *   All issues were around the topic of "set of software".

The WCAG2ICT Task Force has now created a definition of "set of software" as requested, and revised the 4 SC involved.

These 5 items are now submitted to the WCAG WG for approval.  There is also a 6th item which asks a clarifying question for SC 3.2.4 and suggests that the clarification also be included in the INTENT for that SC in Understanding WCAG 2.0.
The survey is at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/FINAL4SC/



SURVEY 2  INFORMATION

The evaluation Task force has completed its review of comments and created a new draft of its document
            Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0
that it would like to send our for review before CSUN.

A survey covering the comment responses -- and the draft is prepared and available at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAGevalTaskForce/

WCAG EVALUATION IS A VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC
Please give this document your attention and fill out the survey so that we can try to review the responses and text of the document as part of this weeks agenda.