Re: Proposals for open issues with no response

I have a written a response for lc-2585 (and will hopefully propose a
revised f69 failure - sorry it has taken so long)

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Loretta Guarino Reid <
lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:

> I'm trying to put together this week's survey, and I have come across
> several issues marked as proposals for which there are extensive WG
> comments, but no actual proposal for a response. Unfortunately, I can't
> tell who edited the issues! I'd love to get these on the survey. If you
> edited an issue, please let me know so we can see whether we can get a
> response drafter and put onto the survey. The particular issue numbers are
>
> LC-2616<https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20120103/2616>:
> Why is "navigation" confused with "input"
> LC-2621<https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20120103/2621>:
> The permissible uses of heading levels and F43
> LC-2585<https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20120103/2585>:
> Known failures should include setting main page container overflow to
> hidden preventing scrollbars
> LC-2620<https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/2620>:
> Reference to the title attribute on a techniqu that deals with abbr
>
> P.S. Thank you so much, unjknown WG member, for taking the time to review
> these issues and writing up your thoughts about them...
>