Thanks, everyone! I've updated the survey to fix these issues. Steve, I hope you will be able to join us on Thursday (although I realize it is not a convenient time for you). On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi All, > I am pleased to see that the html5 alt document is being reviewed. > > comments: > 2. Example 5.1 > > Example 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har> doesn’t have > a Title element in the image link to a long description but 2.2 does have > one and recommends it. (It is recommended that this use of Title attribute > be checked with the WCAG WG). > > I am unclear what the relationship between example 5.1<http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har>and example > 2.2 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#ex22> is? > > Is 5.1 the correct reference? > > Also note the question refere to the title element should be title > attribute. > > 3. Example 6.4 > the mention of 'willful violation' is in reference to the WHATWG HTML > living standard which states that the type of image described in example > 6.4 MUST have a null alt text. > > regards > Steve > > > On 28 April 2012 02:17, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>wrote: > >> I wanted to give people extra time on this one: >> >> "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" for 03 May 2012 >> *<http://tinyurl.com/cy7q8qm*> >> > > > >
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 14:33:33 UTC