Hi All, I am pleased to see that the html5 alt document is being reviewed. comments: 2. Example 5.1 Example 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har> doesn’t have a Title element in the image link to a long description but 2.2 does have one and recommends it. (It is recommended that this use of Title attribute be checked with the WCAG WG). I am unclear what the relationship between example 5.1<http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#har>and example 2.2 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/#ex22> is? Is 5.1 the correct reference? Also note the question refere to the title element should be title attribute. 3. Example 6.4 the mention of 'willful violation' is in reference to the WHATWG HTML living standard which states that the type of image described in example 6.4 MUST have a null alt text. regards Steve On 28 April 2012 02:17, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>wrote: > I wanted to give people extra time on this one: > > "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives" for 03 May 2012 > *<http://tinyurl.com/cy7q8qm*> >
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 08:21:21 UTC