- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:20:19 -0400
- To: "'Tina Holmboe'" <tina@greytower.net>
- CC: "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Perhaps that's a good point, I'm wondering which manufacturers are not getting on WAI ARIA. I think our unofficial rule of thumb is about 3 versions back... Almost every screen reader supports WAI ARIA, although some better than others, and the new browsers do... which are free. I don't think it will be long before aria-labelledby will be implemented fairly ubiquitously in all assistive technologies and user agents to the extent that <label> is... I guess there may be some government departments that are about 2 versions behind because they have to test every new version before installation. They should be using WAI ARIA browsers within a year or so... I can't think of too many other scenarios... David MacDonald www.eramp.co -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tina Holmboe Sent: June-29-11 1:33 PM To: David MacDonald Cc: 'WCAG' Subject: Re: F68 forbids WAI ARIA to replace label element On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:24:16PM -0400, David MacDonald wrote: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20101014/F68 > > > I think we'll need to allow for wai-aria (labelledby), while acknowledging > the preference to native code. LABEL and labelledby, or LABEL, surely; but labelledby alone will surely have a nasty impact on non-ARIA supporting UAs? -- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies www.greytower.net CEO Quality and Accessibility www.sitesifter.co.uk blog.greytower.net www.twitter.com/GreytowerTech
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 18:21:14 UTC