- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:21:05 +0000
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <vanderhe@spamarrest.com>
- CC: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Right. So, does this pass or not? If I can't figure it out as a member of the working group, I suspect others will have the same question. -----Original Message----- From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:vanderhe@spamarrest.com] Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:46 AM To: Cynthia Shelly Cc: Sailesh Panchang; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: 4.1.1 question, not clearly documented validating is A test that is sufficient. it is not THE test and is not required. gregg On Feb 20, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Cynthia Shelly wrote: > I understand that's how to test that the validation technique has > been done. But, validation is only a technique, and techniques are > optional. This case isn't listed in the failure. Should it be? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:spanchang02@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:44 PM > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Cc: Cynthia Shelly > Subject: Re: 4.1.1 question, not clearly documented > > Cynthia, > > Validating the code through a validator is the test for 4.1.1. This > is with regard to the DTD. This will ensure it is "according to > their specifications". How a browser or AT handles this is of no > concern. > I think the SC and hints for testing are sufficiently clear. > Regards, > Sailesh Panchang > www.deque.com > Tel 571-344-1765 (C) > 703-225-0380 (work) > > --- On Thu, 2/19/09, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com> >> Subject: 4.1.1 question, not clearly documented >> To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> >> Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 6:25 PM >> I couldn't find a definitive answer to this question by >> looking at the 4.1.1 text or failures. >> >> If a page has a doctype of XHMTL 1.0 and includes an IMG or >> INPUT tag that isn't self-closing, does it pass 4.1.1? >> >> <input type="text"> is allowed in HTML >> <input type="text" /> would be expected in >> XHTML >> >> BUT, it's not entirely clear whether >> <input type="text"> in XHTML passes. I >> don't believe it causes any problems, it's still >> parseable by user agents, but I'm not sure if it >> violates >> "elements have complete start and end tags, elements >> are nested according to their specifications," >> >> Can we clarify this in a technique or failure? > > > > >
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 18:21:48 UTC