- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:12:49 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 5 Sep, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
>> The ball should be firmly kicked back to those who creates UAs which
>> fail to take advantage of the semantic interpretation that is there.
>
> Sure, but accessibility is not a theoretical exercise based on "should".
> For example, finding an accessible image replacement technique wasn't just
> a matter of reading specs but involved a lot of testing.
Correct. It's a cooperative effort between content creators, spec
manufacturers, and browser writers - if we don't ALL cooperate we ALL
lose.
In this case the specification is there, the document authors has done
their job, now the AT writers must do theirs.
--
- Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies
http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net
Website Quality and Accessibility Testing
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 15:13:24 UTC