- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:12:36 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Christophe Strobbe wrote: > Sure, but accessibility is not a theoretical exercise based on "should". > For example, finding an accessible image replacement technique wasn't > just > a matter of reading specs but involved a lot of testing. That would be because image replacement is a dirty hack (having content, hiding it from some users, and then cloning it in the _background_ so they can still access it, while not hiding it from users who can't access the background), and not something HTML was designed for.
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 15:13:14 UTC