- From: Sofia Celic <Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:46:23 +1100
- To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lorettaguarino@google.com>, "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Loretta, Can you please clarify which versions of the documents we are required to review. Please post URLs. With thanks, Sofia -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2007 12:22 PM To: WCAG Subject: Consistency review It's time to do a consistency review of our documents for publication. We've drafted the following tentative assignments of success criteria to working group members at http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Consistency_Review * Andi Snow-Weaver (Just the GL Understanding docs) GL 1.1, GL 1.2, GL 1.3, GL 1.4, GL 2.1, GL 2.2, GL 2.3, GL 2.4, GL 3.1, GL 3.2, GL 3.3, GL 4.1 * Drew LaHart 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.3.1, 1.3.3 * Alex Li 1.4.4, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3 * Bengt Farre 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4 * Bruce Bailey 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4, 2.2.5 * Christophe Strobbe 2.4.4, 2.4.9, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.4 * Cynthia Shelley 1.3.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.7 * Sean Hayes 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 1.2.5, 1.2.6, 1.2.7 * David MacDonald 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.8, 2.4.10 * Gregg Vanderheiden 1.4.3, 1.4.6, 2.3.1, 2.3.2 * Katie Haritos-Shea 3.1.3, 3.1.5, 3.1.6 * Sofia Celic 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.4.5, 1.4.7, 1.4.8, 1.4.9 * Tim Boland 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4, 3.3.5, 3.3.6 * Roberto Ellero 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5 Are we missing any working group members who can help with this review? Can you let us know whether you will NOT be able to review these SC before Nov 30? Michael would love to start seeing changes sooner than that, of course. Tasks in a Consistency Review: - Check that the success criterion wording is consistent - Check that the names of techniques are consistent between the Understanding Doc and the Technique - Check that the language used in the Understanding Doc and the Technique Doc is consistent with the SC wording. Sometimes descriptions were written against earlier versions of the SC - Check for any typos, grammatical problems, formatting problems - Check for *showstopper* content problems, e.g., this Understanding Doc or Technique is contradicting the SC. Thanks, Loretta ________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside Newsletters for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! www.ellaforspam.com
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 00:46:49 UTC