Re: SURVEY: Miscellaneous Proposals for 5 Nov 2007

The decision at the end of the meeting was not to change the current
wording of SC 2.4.3, which is why it is not listed in the current
proposal. If you feel it should be changed, please suggest that in
your response to the survey.

Thanks, Loretta

On Nov 2, 2007 9:06 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> I missed the end of the call due to a sick daughter, but I can't imagine
> how we can possibly be resurveying issues for 2.4.n without 2.4.3 also.
> In the last survey:
>
> 8 people liked the change to 2.4.3
> 3 said accept with changes:
>         - OK I guess but i like the current one better.
>         - Use the same language (either) "reading sequence" or "reading
> order" (or both), or "resding order sequence" in the two SC.
>         - Prefer previous wording, but this is okay.
> 3 said "do not accept"
>         - 2 of these depended on the new 2.4.n that we are resurveying
>
> I feel strongly that we should be resurveying the 2.4.3 change also.
>
> AWK
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:26 AM
> > To: WCAG
> > Subject: SURVEY: Miscellaneous Proposals for 5 Nov 2007
> >
> >
> > Yesterday's meeting ran late, and we discussed some difficult
> > issues at the end. We would like the working group to review
> > the decisions made at the end of the meeting in the following survey:
> >
> > Miscellaneous Proposals for 05 Nov 2007:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20071105misc/
> >
> > Because we need to send out responses to issues, we need your
> > feedback as soon as possible. We are leaving the survey open
> > until Monday, but ask that you fill it in as soon as you can.
> >
> > Loretta
> >
> >
>
>

Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 16:25:13 UTC