RE: SURVEY: Miscellaneous Proposals for 5 Nov 2007

I missed the end of the call due to a sick daughter, but I can't imagine
how we can possibly be resurveying issues for 2.4.n without 2.4.3 also.
In the last survey:

8 people liked the change to 2.4.3
3 said accept with changes:
	- OK I guess but i like the current one better. 
	- Use the same language (either) "reading sequence" or "reading
order" (or both), or "resding order sequence" in the two SC.
	- Prefer previous wording, but this is okay.
3 said "do not accept"
	- 2 of these depended on the new 2.4.n that we are resurveying

I feel strongly that we should be resurveying the 2.4.3 change also.

AWK



> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: WCAG
> Subject: SURVEY: Miscellaneous Proposals for 5 Nov 2007
> 
> 
> Yesterday's meeting ran late, and we discussed some difficult 
> issues at the end. We would like the working group to review 
> the decisions made at the end of the meeting in the following survey:
> 
> Miscellaneous Proposals for 05 Nov 2007:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20071105misc/
> 
> Because we need to send out responses to issues, we need your 
> feedback as soon as possible. We are leaving the survey open 
> until Monday, but ask that you fill it in as soon as you can.
> 
> Loretta
> 
>

Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 16:07:25 UTC