RE: Revised Conformance section for WCAG

Your edit is posted (with the word 'attained') to the review draft comments
for consideration by the working group as it reviews the new conformance
language.


Gregg
 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sailesh Panchang
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:06 PM
> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Revised Conformance section for WCAG
>
>
> Jason,
> Yes I agree  to your editorial change. Thanks for that. But
> first I hope the "suggested wording" is accepted.
> Sailesh
>
> --- Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:41:25PM -0700, Sailesh Panchang wrote:
> > > Suggested wording:
> > > When a series of Web pages present sequential
> > steps
> > > that need to be completed in order to accomplish a task (or an
> > > activity), conformance at a particular level  may be
> claimed only if
> > > all Web pages in the series conform at that  level.
> > > ===
> >
> > Editorial comment: substitute "attained" for "claimed".
> This part of
> > the Conformance section is not concerned with whether claims can be
> > made, but with whether or not Web pages conform (at a given level).
> > I think the requirements
> > should therefore be stated in terms of conformance itself
> rather than
> > in terms of conformance claims.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels
> with Yahoo! FareChase.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/
>
>

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 19:04:03 UTC