- From: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Jason, Yes I agree to your editorial change. Thanks for that. But first I hope the "suggested wording" is accepted. Sailesh --- Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:41:25PM -0700, Sailesh > Panchang wrote: > > Suggested wording: > > When a series of Web pages present sequential > steps > > that need to be completed in order to accomplish a > > task (or an activity), conformance at a particular > > level may be claimed only if all Web pages in the > > series conform at that level. > > === > > Editorial comment: substitute "attained" for > "claimed". This part of the > Conformance section is not concerned with whether > claims can be made, but with > whether or not Web pages conform (at a given level). > I think the requirements > should therefore be stated in terms of conformance > itself rather than in terms > of conformance claims. > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 18:06:30 UTC