- From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:49:09 -0400
- To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
With his permission, I am forwarding a brief exchange with the lead on User Experience Research for Snap.com. > From: Bailey Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov> > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:31:31 -0400 > To: Erik Wingren <erik@snap.com> > Conversation: ZoomText and Snap > Subject: ZoomText and Snap > > Greeting Erik. > > I happened across your post at URL: > http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/lets-hear-from-the-disabled/#com ment-263316 > > This is something I have quite recently asked the W3C WAI WCAG 2.0 > working group to discuss. I think it will come up this Thursday (4:00 > EST). > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2007JulSep/0099.html > > Did you make any progress back in May? > > Thanks very much! > > -- > Bruce Bailey, Accessibility IT Specialist, U.S. Access Board > 1331 F Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Room 1014 Washington, DC 20004-1111 > 202-272-0024 (voice); 202-272-0082 (TTY, shared); 202-272-0081 (Fax, > shared) > bailey@access-board.gov -----Original Message----- From: Erik Wingren [mailto:erik@snap.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 7:32 PM To: Bailey Bruce Subject: Re: ZoomText and Snap Hi Bailey, Unfortunately I never heard back from Jo, but alarmed by these reports I conducted a round of informal testing using ZoomText (which, as far as I understand, is the most common Zoom application). Essentially I recruited a handful of people working in the same office building as Snap (not associated with Snap and unfamiliar with Snap Shots) who wear eye glasses and asked them to take off their glasses and visit a few Snap Shots enabled blogs with ZoomText turned on. Far from ideal, I still figured this testing was better than none... Apart from an overwhelming awe for the people who depend on these technologies on a daily basis, we concluded that we needed to do a better job of not "jarring" the reading experience for users of Zoom applications. Changes to the product informed by this testing include: 1. Make the Snap Link Icon a default during site owner signup. 2. Offer site owners the option to activate hover over Snap Link Icon *only*. 3. Disabling activation of the Snap Shots bubble while user is scrolling. 4. Allowing end-users easy opt-out, directly from the bubble. 5. Allowing end-users to extend the delay before activation and deactivation from the in-bubble options menu. 6. Offer an "Opt-In Badge" where a site owner can let their readers turn the feature on themselves. 7. Encouraging site owners to announce the new functionality and while doing so, provide their readers with instructions for how to disable the feature if they do not want it. 8. Sending follow-up emails to site owners after signup reiterating the importance of the above through pointing them to pages such as <http://www.snap.com/about/bestpractices.php> I did read your post on the W3.org mailing list, and based on my understanding thereof, it seems like we have come to somewhat different conclusions when comparing Snap Shots to other "preview hover effects" such as Netflix (and the Smithsonian example, which I had not seen until today). Maybe I misunderstood your post but when using ZoomText we found Snap Shots < not Netflix < as the *less* jarring of the two. In our testing the predominant issue was "loss of orientation" when the bubble was deactivated (via accidental mouseout) at a magnification level of 4x or higher. After some tweaking we found that the usability/accessibility of Snap Shots + Zoom application improved when (A) the bubble stayed fixated once activated and (B) the default hover delay allowed for the user to move his/her cursor in over the bubble. In fact, at the ZoomText out-of-box default magnification of 2x, we found the "condensed interaction" of our rich Snap Shots such as RSS Shot and WikiShot a "more useful experience than clicking through the regular hyperlink". For your reference, a full range of different types of Shots currently offered is available at the lower part of the following page: <http://www.snap.com/about/shots_central.php>. I would be more than interested in learning about what comes out of your discussion. If there is anything further that you think I can provide, please do not hesitate to let me know. Best Regards. -- Erik Wingren Brand & User Experience Research Snap.com <http://www.snap.com/> e. erik@snap.com o. +1.626.229.3030 m. +1.323.528.0058
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 00:46:32 UTC