- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:45:39 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 23:14:00 UTC
A follow up to one of my comments on the Survey that was tabled. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SimplifiedIntroAndConformance/results#xi ntroedi I think the language of 1.4.2 needs an adjustment. Or it needs to be fixed in the intent. <current SC 1.4.2>or a mechanism is available to control audio volume which ....</current SC 1.4.2> An example. Some authors might say the user has "control" if they can only adjust the volume a bit... which would defeat the purpose of the SC and let them have distracting background. Let's add to the Intent... "Control means that the volume can be reduced to zero DB" David MacDonald ....access empowers people... ...barriers disable them... www.eramp.com
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 23:14:00 UTC