- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:18:26 +0100
- To: <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: <koch@w3development.de>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thank you Oliver. I will forward / keep you in contact with IWA/HWG experts that can do this.
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "olivier Thereaux"<ot@w3.org>
Inviato: 02/11/06 2.03.05
A: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Cc: "'Johannes Koch'"<koch@w3development.de>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oggetto: Re: [Bug 1793] xml report: outline
Dear Roberto,
On Nov 2, 2006, at 02:46 , Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote:
> So at now there is no tool of W3C that give outline
There is. The semantic extractor does it just fine. The example you
quote is a page that has broken markup and isn't even well formed.
So, indeed, it makes the xslt-based semantic extractor trip. Try it
on a proper web page, however, and it will work.
As I mentioned a few times already, we are not letting go of this
feature in the markup validator for the fun of it. No project has
unlimited resources, and the development of the markup validator is
no exception. The priority for the markup validator is validation,
and using a new third-party library to provide better, faster
validation for all makes sense. Even if it means, for now,
sacrificing a feature that is not related to validation (sadly
bothering less than 1% of our user base) and covered by another tool.
Let me reiterate that the validator is open source: if you care about
a feature at risk, working on code and submitting a patch will get
you better results than endless arguments on mailing-lists. You wrote
you could "ask to [your] experts to fix this missing feature".
Please, feel free to do so.
Kind regards,
--
olivier
[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 05:18:13 UTC