- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:13:29 +0100
- To: <koch@w3development.de>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: <ot@w3.org>
----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Johannes Koch"<koch@w3development.de> Inviato: 01/11/06 23.20.42 A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Cc: "ot@w3.org"<ot@w3.org> Oggetto: Re: [Bug 1793] xml report: outline Sorry, but if this is really the situation, this part of the italian law seems silly to me. How can a government make a law that requires a specific feature of a software, that the government can not guarantee to be stable forever? And why is it not allowed to check the outline with a different tool? Roberto: It is a misunderstanding. You can check with everything you want but it was the suggested tool due is a w3c official tool: no worry, there will be other tools, but i hope w3c validator don't made same end of Amaya... As developer (since about 20 years) I've always seen that features are removed - if moved in other tools - when the new tool works, and now the new tool don't works. Is too much to know why projects that also I indirectly pay take these decisions? I'm also waiting to know who contact to make this implementation by our developers for don't delay precious time of the w3c-beta-next-generation tools producers.
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 05:13:17 UTC