- From: Marja Koivunen <marja@annotea.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:53:48 -0400
- To: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- CC: 'Gregg Vanderheiden' <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, 'John M Slatin' <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Content is often given structure to help users process it. The structure is defined by chunks of content that have implicitly or explicitly defined relationships. For instance, a picture with an underlying caption can have an implicit relationship only defined by the proximity of the chunks in the content source or proximity in the graphical presentation. In a more explicit relationship a chunk of type "container" can include both the picture and the caption chunks. Finally, typed relationships can be defined explicitly between content chunks with identifiers. Marja David MacDonald wrote: > Except I would say “form control” instead of “control.” > > Its easier to understand and it is an example so I think the specific > reference is ok. > > //access empowers people...// > > // ...barriers disable them...// > > www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com> > > //access empowers people...// > > // ...barriers disable them...// > > www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] > *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2006 10:27 AM > *To:* 'John M Slatin'; 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > *Subject:* RE: Definition of "Relationships" > > Agree. > > Also talk about form controls > > Hmmmm > > So maybe something like: > > Definition of **Relationships**: > > "semantic associations between distinct chunks of content" > > Examples of chunks that have relationships include: a heading and the > paragraph which follows it; a section title and the subsections that > are within it; a control and its label; the boxes in an organization > or flow chart; and table cells and their headers. > > Other comments? > > > Gregg > > -- ------------------------------ > Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. > Director - Trace R & D Center > University of Wisconsin-Madison > The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b > <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] > *On Behalf Of *John M Slatin > *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2006 7:59 AM > *To:* David MacDonald; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > *Subject:* RE: Definition of "Relationships" > > Thanks, David! > > It might be good to add a non-text example, e.g., "Associations > between positions shown in an organizational chart" or "Associations > beteween decision-points in a flow-chart" or something like that. > > John > > "Good design is accessible design." > > Dr. John M. Slatin, Director > Accessibility Institute > University of Texas at Austin > FAC 248C > 1 University Station G9600 > Austin, TX 78712 > ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 > email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu > Web http://www.utexas.edu > <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/>/research/accessibility > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *David MacDonald > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:14 PM > *To:* w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > *Subject:* Definition of "Relationships" > > I had an action item with Katie to come up with a definition of > Relationship… > > This is the proposal: > > Definition of **Relationships**: > > "Semantic associations between distinct chunks of content." > > Example 1: A heading is in relationship to the paragraph which > follows it. > Example 2: A section title is in relationship to the subsections > that are within it. > > ----------------------- > > Discussion: > > "Semantic" is another way to say "meaningful" (as per the > Wikipaedia definition of Semantic) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic > > So the definition could also be: > > "Meaningful associations between distinct chunks of content." But > I think semantic works better. > > "chunks" could be replaced by "portions" or "sections" but I think > "chunks" is very understandable. > > David MacDonald > > //access empowers people...// > > // ...barriers disable them...// > > www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com> >
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 16:54:28 UTC