RE: CSS Parsed Unambiguously

No

Actually it would be a page that was accessible ONLY to people with
disabilities (who use screen reader or don't use style sheets). 

If we can restrict ourselves to problem that actually occur in pages on the
web it would be helpful.

Black text on black background is not going to ship.   And is not an
accessibility problem.  People with disabilities and using AT are actually
at an advantage, not disadvantage. 

Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tina Holmboe
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: Christophe Strobbe
> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: CSS Parsed Unambiguously
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 04:36:07PM +0200, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
> 
> > This example also shows the limitation of SC 4.1.1 when 
> applied to CSS. 
> > Suppose you had the following style rules (instead of the 
> border-width
> > example):
> > 
> > body { background: white; color: black; }
> > h1 { background: black; color: whitd; } /* reverse the colours, but 
> > with typo in 'white' */
> 
>   So, basically, we /do/ have a case of what I asked last 
> week: a stylesheet
>   can pass SC 4.1.1 and be harmful to accessibility - both at 
> the same time.
> 
>   There is a problem here, isn't there?
> 
> -- 
>  -       Tina Holmboe                           Greytower Technologies
>        tina@greytower.net                      
> http://www.greytower.net
>         +46 708 557 905
> 
>

Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:10:19 UTC