- From: Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 23:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0605052251440.28278@violin.it.uc3m.es>
What kind of errors? 1.- Unacceptable errors that make HTML parsers fail could be checked by a sepparate tool. 2.- Acceptable errors that HTML parsers accept imply no problem for Schematron, XSLT or XQuery rules. 3.- Acceptable errors that make HTML parsers fail should not exist. If they exist, they are a bug in the HTML parser. 4.- Unacceptable errors that HTML parsers accept can be ignored or cheched by a sepparate too. Besides that, both Schematron and XSLT/XQuery rules can be based on ROBUST XPath expressions, so even though reliable parsing is not possible, these techniques can still be applied. It is only a problem of making them robust enough. Vicente Luque Centeno Dep. Ingeniería Telemática Universidad Carlos III de Madrid http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc On Fri, 5 May 2006, Johannes Koch wrote: > > Vicente Luque Centeno wrote: > >> Schematron or XSLT/XQuery rules can be applied to HTML documents if a HTML >> parser (instead of a XML parser) is being used. For instance, my XSLT-based >> Web Accessibility evaluator [1] can be applied to HTML pages that are not >> XHTML (see the extended interface). > > I don't doubt that. But the technique and criterion we're talking about is > about documents that contain errors so that reliable parsing is not possible. > So Schematron or XSLT/XQuery don't help here. > > -- > Johannes Koch > In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. > (Te Deum, 4th cent.) >
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 21:00:34 UTC