- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:25:35 -0500
- To: "'Tim Boland'" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002101c6647d$ebe52370$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
The requirements doc is just a doc we use to define the work of our group. It isn't part of the recommendations or anything. It is a companion document to our charter. In the W3C process - you set out what your requirements are. Agree to them. And then must meet them (or agree to revise them - and meet them) before you can say you are done. (that's a thought. The w3c uses them as a yardstick to see what you are doing and where you are on accomplishing it. Ours was so old - and we had lots of our 'agreements' in it (that were pre-baseline etc) (from when we were just finding our common ground) that it needed updating to be interpreted (referred to lots of things that aren't there anymore). So we are updating it. Should have done it awhile ago but we have been a bit busy of late. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: Tim Boland [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 8:03 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: New requirements document and change log Is this document (referenced in excerpted message following) normative or informative? Perhaps it should be stated at the beginning of this document that it is "informative"?.. The actual (normative) requirements are contained in WCAG2.0, aren't they? The first sentence of the "Abstract" of this document seems to me to imply that the requirements are contained in this document. The "Introduction" and following then seems to discuss goals. Should the first sentence of "Abstract" replace the word "requirements" with "goals"? The word "requirements" to me implies "normative requirements". I think we should perhaps be careful when using the word "requirements" to make sure that's what we actually mean, in a "normative" sense? If these are different kinds of "requirements" from the "normative requirements" in WCAG2.0, then perhaps this difference should be documented? Just a thought.. Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST At 01:23 PM 4/19/2006 -0500, you wrote: xmlns:ns0="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"> As part of our process we are bringing out requirements document up to date. It is attached along with a change log. We will be discussing on tomorrow. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:25:50 UTC