- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:18:19 +0000
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, Guide Lines list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 04/12/05, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > It is interesting that you say that parsing unambiguously is meaningless > when it was cited as one of the major accessibility reasons for requiring > validity. The reason that I think parsed unambiguously is meaningless is that it's not a qualified term. Whether it was explicitly stated or not, I suspect that parsed unambiguously with regards to the appropriate specification was probably more of the reason behind those arguing in favour of validity. > The definition of 'programmatically determined' is also quoted wrong. Sorry; I was paraphrasing, and got a bit carried away. -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2005 06:18:24 UTC