RE: Baseline and Conformance

I have only heard it verbally.  I believe is goes something like this

ISO 9000 requires you to follow policies that you have established.

If you have a policy that says you will follow WCAG 2.0 then you must follow
it.  You can't take it lightly.  (Companies don't want to risk their ISO
9000 status, or even create any ambiguous situations, for any reason they
don't absolutely have to). 

If you make a claim that you follow WCAG 2.0 you also invoke some warrantee
issues (I'm not clear on these).  


Someone more familiar with ISO 9000 can correct these.  I am only passing on
what I remember.  

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Alistair Garrison
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 4:07 AM
To: 'Gregg Vanderheiden'; boland@nist.gov
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Baseline and Conformance


Dear Gregg, all,

I have tried and unfortunately failed to find the archived email / comments
leading to the statement: 

"Many companies want to conform but cannot claim conformance due to ISO 9000
and other factors and liabilities that would kick in when such a claim was
made."    

I would really like to look at the specific reasons why a conformance claim
cannot be made, with a special interest in the issues relating to ISO 9000.


If someone could point me to the source of the information on which this
statement was made I would be very grateful.

Very best regards

Alistair Garrison
Accessinmind Limited

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: 11 November 2005 15:41
To: boland@nist.gov
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Baseline and Conformance


It would not be known.  
People can conform to WCAG or HTML or any spec without telling anyone.

Many companies want to conform but cannot claim conformance due to ISO 9000
and other factors and liabilities that would kick in when such a claim was
made.  

IF they make a claim we can and do say what they must include. But we don't
require that they make a claim.

RE Metadata -- we have been looking / working on this in background for a
long time.  I don't know the status at this time.   Many benefits from it
but it would again take the form of a claim of sorts so it may not always be
used. 

Gregg

 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of boland@nist.gov
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 7:51 AM
To: Gregg Vanderheiden
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Baseline and Conformance


How would conformance be demonstrated/known if not through the mechanism of
a conformance claim?  (NOTE: conformance claims are specifically mentioned
in the context of conformance in QA SpecGL Rec Section 2: Specifying
Conformance
[1]..)

Do we have a set of "metadata terms" to describe baselines, so that baseline
knowledge can be communicated as unambiguously and objectively as possible
across multiple parties/interests, and so that baseline information can be
"managed" effectively?

Apologies if these items have been discussed previously.. 

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST 

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-qaframe-spec-20050817/#specifying-
conformance  


Quoting Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>:

> > 
> Note also that a conformance claim is not needed to conform.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Since we would need to make these changes in the conformance section I 
> am posting them out.
> 
> I had hoped to have a baseline description doc done too but until we 
> discuss this - there are a couple key questions I can't write up.
> 
>  
> 
> So the plan
> 
> 1 - cover this in today's call
> 
> 2 - make the changes in the front-matter that we need to release the
draft. 
> 
> 3 - fix up draft of baseline doc  and release draft for comment and 
> discussion
> 
> 4 - next week discuss and finalize the baseline doc
> 
>  
> 
> Talk to you soon
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Gregg
> 
> ------------------------
> 
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
> Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
> Director - Trace R & D Center
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
> < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 
> For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/
> 
>  <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 18:04:52 UTC