- From: Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. - <ueki@infoaxia.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:55:57 +0900
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hello Roberto, On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 23:54:36 +0100, "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)" wrote: <blockquote> > All depends what you consider for accessible content. > For multimedia captions and audio description are required for let deaf and blind people to understand multimedia contents. > Add captions and audio description take the same editing time, and no particoular skills. > At least is more difficoult made a complex data table instead of captions. </blockquote> Sorry, it is not an answer I wanted to have. My question is "Has WCAG WG reached consensus on the practical reality before?". It doesn't seem to be clear. So I do want to make it clear. And this is a question for not only captioning and audio description. My question is for WCAG 2.0 as a whole. We should discuss everything based on the same premise when creating any guidelines or standards. People would go to different directions if the premises people have are different. My opinion and decision could be also changed. One of the most important things is to discuss everything based on the same premise. Cheers, Makoto
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2005 08:56:10 UTC