- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:45:58 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <007801c5e430$13d13cd0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
It is confusing but the W3C Guidelines are standards. Don't let the word Guidelines confuse you. (side note: The ADA standards are also called guidelines; the ADA Accessibility Guidelines or ADAAG). The WCAG success criteria are used to measure conformance with the standard at 3 levels. The Guidelines and success criteria are normative - that is - they are used to determine conformance with WCAG 2.0. The Guide Doc is an informative document that is separate from the Guidelines. It gives information on the intent of the guidelines as well as listing what the working group considers to be sufficient techniques for meeting the success criteria. I don't know what you mean by a middle layer so I can't help you with that one. . Hope this helps Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bailey, Bruce Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:18 PM To: Matt May Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Validity as a technique Please forgive my peevishness here... > Omitting HTML validity at the guideline level would be acceptable to me. Did you mean guideline level or SC level? I missed the guideline referencing validity, so now I am worried. > I think the language already in the guidelines document is sufficient guidance. By "guidelines document" do you mean WCAG 2 working draft or the supplement techniques documents used for guidance? <rant> This touches upon another significant barrier. I am fine with calling them Guidelines, that is what the G in WCAG stands for after all. And I understand the point that they technically are not standards, despite how useful writing them as if they were might be. And the high level principles and low level success criteria is genius. But using the actual term "guidelines" in the body of WCAG2 in a fashion wholly different from how it was used in WCAG1 is going to cause a *huge* amount of misunderstanding. Is it too late to come up with another term for the middle layer? Thanks. </rant>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 06:46:05 UTC