- From: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:06 -0800
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 04:05:15 UTC
What I mean is that I'd be comfortable if the main WCAG 2 document did not contain mention of HTML validity at the principle, guideline or success criterion level, but did appear in the techniques document. - m On Nov 7, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Bailey, Bruce wrote: > Please forgive my peevishness here... > > > Omitting HTML validity at the guideline level would be acceptable > to me. > > Did you mean guideline level or SC level? I missed the guideline > referencing validity, so now I am worried. > > > I think the language already in the guidelines document is > sufficient guidance. > > By “guidelines document” do you mean WCAG 2 working draft or the > supplement techniques documents used for guidance?
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 04:05:15 UTC