- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:56:54 +0100
- To: <koch@w3development.de>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yes, is what i'm trying to say from my first post. I don't understand why we need to converge to a "mediation" if this is so clear...
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Johannes Koch"<koch@w3development.de>
Inviato: 07/11/05 22.27.23
A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oggetto: Re: Validity as a technique
Yvette Hoitink wrote:
> * We do not require it in the normative section (the guidelines), which
> prevents legal actions against websites that are accessible but do not
> validate because they used an attribute that isn't defined in the specs.
If a valid document is required to meet the success criteria that
require something can be 'programmatically determined', invalid markup
documents cannot meet these success criteria, right?
--
Johannes Koch
Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel.
(Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)
[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 21:53:41 UTC