- From: Kerstin Goldsmith <kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:41:24 -0800
- To: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- CC: bregan@macromedia.com, gez.lemon@gmail.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Yes, but I am seeing people asking for reasoning that has already been discussed -- I am seeing repetition of questions that have already been addressed. It is really frustrating to go around and around in circles over and over again. Please read the notes, the email threads, and the minutes. Everything that is being discussed on the thread today has already been discussed in detail in the past. How are we going to come to consensus over this? -Kerstin Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote: >----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "Kerstin Goldsmith"<kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com> > This issue has been discussed in detail at many conference calls, through long email threads, and in face-to-face meetings. Are people who are re-opening the issue really saying that they do not trust that those who were involved in those previous discussions are capable of coming to a reasonable and well-informed decision about this? That, too, is some form of prejudice or arrogance, in my opinion. > > Roberto Scano: >Hi Kerstin, >The problem is that this issue is not yet defined/discussed: in the last two f2f there was no decisions. > > >
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 20:41:46 UTC