- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:46:58 +0100
- To: <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Andrew Kirkpatrick"<akirkpatrick@macromedia.com> Inviato: 04/11/05 16.27.06 A: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Oggetto: RE: Validity > Roberto: > Yewùs but sorry, this is a vendor-technology and user agent > issue, not a wcag issue. It is important for the group to decide whether it wants to operate in a vacuum or not. It is a WCAG issue if you want the document used. Roberto: Bob said clearly that is your/AT problem. WCAG should tell developers how to implement accessibility web contents. Flash, imho, is like Java: an object with it's player that should be directly accessible. If i'm a flash developer and i work following your guidelines for make this object directly accessible i pretend that if i insert this object inside an html/xhtml page: - the object don't damage my code conformance - the browser, with your plugin installed, make contents accessible. You instead are saying: - we have developed this with embed - at works well with this solution - put invalid code and damage your page conformance
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 15:44:07 UTC