- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:43:35 -0500
- To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'Johannes Koch'" <koch@w3development.de>, "'WAI WCAG List'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yes I think that is correct. The transport is irrelevant. It is the form of the data when it is 'viewed' or processed by the user agent. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John M Slatin Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 9:44 AM To: Johannes Koch; WAI WCAG List Subject: RE: Glossary "non-text content" Small Nit I think this thread began as a discussion about how to define non-text content for the purposes of WCAG 2.0. I think there was an unspoken assumption that the problem has to do with non-text content as it is rendered for users, rather than with the form in which such content is transmitted. Does that distinction make sense? Can we focus on a glossary definition that will help developers and other readers of WCAG 2.0 understand when something qualifies as non-text content (and is thus within the scope of Guideline 1.1)? Thanks, John "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Johannes Koch Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 9:25 AM To: 'WAI WCAG List' Subject: Re: Glossary "non-text content" Small Nit Richard Ishida wrote: >> I cannot understand this. Images and binary content are transferred >> as bytes, but not Unicode characters, surely. Chris Ridpath wrote: > Images and binary content are usually send as ASCII characters. Weird > eh? > > Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the MIME standard: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIME In MIME, yes. But this is Web Content Accessibility, not Email Accessibility. However, there may be situations when binary data are stored as characters, Base64 encoded, e.g. when using the data URL scheme. -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.)
Received on Friday, 14 October 2005 04:43:43 UTC